Yesterday Was Black Tuesday

Yesterday was black Tuesday, Microsoft has released a new batch of patches for security fixes, you need to head off to Microsoft Update and get patched if you use Microsoft Operating Sytems or Office Packages on your computer:

MS08-019 Important

Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Visio Could Allow Remote Code Execution (949032)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-019.mspx

MS08-021 Critical

Vulnerabilities in GDI Could Allow Remote Code Execution (948590)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-021.mspx

MS08-022 Critical

Vulnerability in VBScript and JScript Scripting Engines Could Allow Remote Code Execution (944338)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-022.mspx

MS08-023 – Critical

Security Update of ActiveX Kill Bits (948881)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-023.mspx

MS08-024 – Critical

Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (947864)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-024.mspx

MS08-018 Critical

Vulnerability in Microsoft Project Could Allow Remote Code Execution (950183)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-018.mspx

MS08-020 Important

Vulnerability in DNS Client Could Allow Spoofing (945553)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-020.mspx

MS08-025 Important

Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (941693)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-025.mspx

PPP vs MQM Clash in Karachi Claims 7 Lives

Riots and mayhem broke out today between differing “lawyer groups”, in reality PPP lawyers vs. MQM lawyers. Five people were burnt to death trapped on the upper floor of a building, and a seven year old child was shot in the head.

This factional fighting goes back nearly to the founding of the state of Pakistan, and it takes only thin excuse for either side to act out. It’s a shame that it’s overwhelming goals of the new government. Party leads from both sides really need to get this under control.

From AP:

KARACHI, Pakistan (AP) — A street fight between political rivals spiraled into rioting in Pakistan’s biggest city Wednesday, with armed men smashing cars and setting fires. Five people burned to death in one building and two were shot and killed.

It was the worst political violence Pakistan’s new government has faced since taking office last month, vowing to curtail the powers of U.S.-allied President Pervez Musharraf and cement democracy after eight years of military rule.

The trouble broke out when pro- and anti-government attorneys punched and beat each other with sticks near the main courts complex in Karachi. Soon after, armed men in began shooting and torching cars in several districts, witnesses said.

A nearby building was set ablaze, and five charred bodies were found on the sixth floor, said police officer Syed Sulaiman. Two other people died of gunshot wounds, including a paramedic whose ambulance came under fire while trying to the injured.

Salman Naguri, a 22-year-old shopkeeper, said he saw two men on a motorbike shoot at passing ambulance, which crashed into an electricity pylon.

“For 15 or 20 minutes an injured man was crying for help from inside the ambulance but nobody helped him,” Naguri said. When another ambulance crew arrived, the man was dead, he said.

Much more on the incidents that led up to today’s violence from Darwaish at All Things Pakistan.

Previously:

Television Censored in Karachi

Less than a Year Ago in Karachi

The London 7/7 Bombers had Scouts

Like most terror operations involving suicide bombers there are scouts who survey and locate targets and target areas first. Sometimes the scouts act as handlers on the side, holding a remote to detonate the bomb if the bomber changes their mind or loses nerve

Like most terror operations involving suicide bombers there are scouts who survey and locate targets and target areas first. Sometimes the scouts act as handlers on the side, holding a remote to detonate the bomb if the bomber changes their mind or loses nerve.

Right now the London terror trials reveal the miscreants who assisted the bombers.

From The Daily Mail:

These are the three men accused of helping the 7 July bombers to identify possible targets in London.

The three were due to stand trial today – the first prosecution in connection with the atrocity – on charges of conspiring with the four suicide bombers to cause explosions.

As a jury for their trial was sworn in today, a judge lifted an order banning publication of drawings or photographs of the accused men.

Waheed Ali, 24, Sadeer Saleem, 27, and Mohammed Shakil, 31, all deny conspiring to cause explosions.

Al Qaeda is the Neo-Kharijite Sect

Whenever AQ stays in any region too long, the locals recognize them for what they are, they are the Neo-Kharijites, the New Azraqi’s. Just another edition of the sect that first split Islam in the first Islamic Civil war. It’s not a mistake that after the war the Kharijites turned to terror just as Al Qaeda has.

Here’s another example of why I find it hilarious that Ayman Al Zawahiri tried to call someone else “kharijite”.
.

New Pakistan Government Censors TV (Updated: Not the Government)

Although it was one of the things the Pakistan People’s Party campaigned upon they have now demonstrated that they are only against Musharraf’s Censorship. When it comes to PPP, censorship is just fine.

In a ridiculous move the government has moved against GEO TV and Ary One World TV after they showed footage of PPP activists stopping an opposition member from swearing in by beating him. 

SEE Update regarding this strikeout below.

See this updated story at Dawn.

KARACHI, April 7: Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Sherry Rehman has asked the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) to investigate how transmissions of two major satellite television networks were suspended on Monday.

All channels of the Geo and ARY networks, including their news channels, were off air for over two hours on Monday evening in Karachi and other major cities of Sindh.

Ms Rehman made it clear that the government had nothing to do with the suspension. However, she said, a certain political party was reported to be behind the blackout.

An official of the All Pakistan Cable Operators Association cited ‘technical problems’ for the suspension of transmission. “The transmission of Geo and ARY was restored after two hours. It was because of some technical problems. We are trying to determine the exact reason,” said Khalid Arain, vice-chairman of the association

Apparently the government was not at fault, however someone shut down cable feeds to Karachi for two stations for two hours, likely they were party activists. Having seen other incidents similar to this in the past in Karachi it’s predictable that both parties (MQM and PPP) will make accusations against the other and demand investigations from Pemra.

It’s likely that the investigation will reveal nothing but more confusion, I will leave it to the readers as to who had the most motive to shut off the televsion stations in Karachi.

It’s also  evident that the emnity between the two parties carries on past the re-dawning of democracy in Pakistan. That’s a shame as there are many more important things for both parties to focus on than the personal vendettas of the past.

 There are terror armies in the frontiers of Pakistan, there are people who can’t afford to eat, there’s commerce to consider, and the future of the constitution. They must put the past aside and focus on the future.

One other note on this — Sherry Rehman is with the PPP party, and prior to them taking power with the lead of the current government coalition she was one of their more active leaders in Karachi.

UPDATE: The violence against MQM continues, driving them from the coalition to opposition benches.

—————-

Previously:

Below us the story I based my original post on from Adnikronos International, needless to say I will second source stories from AKI before running with them in the future.

More from AKI:

Karachi, 7 April (AKI – By Syed Saleem Shahzad) – Pakistan’s newly elected coalition government led by the Pakistan Peoples Party made freedom of the media a major issue when it took two TV news channels off the air.

The channels, ARY One World TV and GEO TV, confirmed they had been taken off air after showing footage of the beating of former chief minister Arbab Ghulam Rahim by Pakistan Peoples Party workers in the provincial legislature assembly.

The officials of the both channels confirmed that their networks were off air throughout the country after airing the footage of the former chief minister and the newly elected member of the provincial assembly, Arbab Ghulam Rahim, by the PPP workers.

He was dragged and beaten on Saturday when he entered in the provincial assembly to take oath. Sources said his life was saved only when he sought refuge insidet the parliament and was sent home under the police protection without taking the oath.

This morning he tried again to take his oath of office but the Pakistan Peoples Party workers, who had overwhelmed security arrangements at the provincial assembly, grabbed him and beaten him with shoes.

UPDATE 4/8/ 06:25: I have a commenter who says they are the director of ARY One with a correction of the assumption I made from the AKI story :

your story is not bassed on factual position. Our TV channels was not closed down for showing ex chief minister footage. pl do clarify that this was not govertnment action against TV Channels. — Mohsin Raza Director News ARY

Unfortunately he didn’t clarify what caused the closure, and neither does the AKI story. I’m in all day meetings today so I will have to let this hang unfortunately until I can research it some more. If someone does know precisely why the two stations went off the air please do drop a comment to save me some digging.

Saddam’s WMD Found?

WMD’s would explain the lack of reaction from Syria, and the tight wraps on information about the strike since it occurred.

wmd_symbols.jpg.

Holger Awakens has an interesting post up regarding a news story from Jerusalem Post indicating that the Israeli strike into Syria last September was against a cache of WMD’s from Iraq. Information is thin at the moment, but this does glue many things back together, and explains quite a few mysteries. It’s too soon to call it certain, which is why you see the question mark above.

WMD’s would explain the lack of reaction from Syria, and the tight wraps on information about the strike since it occurred. From Holger:

Bombshell. There’s a joint report coming out from the U.S. and Israel regarding the Israeli strike in Syria last year by the IAF. That report, it has been leaked, contains proof that Saddam Hussein had transferred his WMD’s to Syria at some point

UPDATE: Little Green Footballs carrying the story 

UPDATE:  More at Democracy Broadcasting

From World Net Daily Feb 15, 2006: Saddam Hussein’s No. 2 Air Force officer, Georges Sada, told the New York Sun Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction were moved to Syria six weeks before the war started. Sada claimed two Iraqi Airways Boeing jets converted to cargo planes moved the weapons in a total of 56 flights. They attracted little attention, he said, because they were thought to be civilian flights providing relief from Iraq to Syria, which had suffered a flood after a dam collapse in 2002. (note they also have Fox News video)

image credit: Andrux at Wikimedia Commons

Two Years of Blogging

thanos-ii.jpgOn April 1st I passed the two year mark, quietly unoticed by myself, or anyone else. It’s been a great deal of fun and driven a lot of soul searching, as well as many long hours of research (it’s never as easy as it looks.)

 I’ve learned new things, I’ve eaten some crow when I was wrong on facts, and I’ve taken my share of slings and arrows. During all of that I’ve been consistently a lot more right than wrong as time played out, and through the long term views I take I hope to offer you a different look at current events.

Google news doesn’t want me and neither does Pajamas Media, but then I am not a consensus follower – I’ll never show up in Alexis, but I’m ok with that, and you should be too, after all the burgeoning crowd generally heads too far in the right direction through inertia and finds themselves sometimes at cliff’s edge. 

Many of the things I originally meant to write about are still out there, over-run sometimes by the urgent, but those main themes are being developed over time. You can see some of them in the sidebar. My audience isn’t large, and I don’t intend it to be — what I do find is that mostly other bloggers come here. Some of them even borrow things, which is somewhat ok if you don’t steal my writing outright – the propagation of the ideas is much more important than credit to me.

So my goal is to influence rather than to drive populogue, I would rather make folks think than make them fear, froth, or fulminate. This online journal is about hope for the future and the changes coming, but it’s firmly reality-based. Omigosh… I sound almost like Obama… However you don’t have to vote for change: the future is going to happen and that always brings new change, that always brings new hope, and it brings it whether you want it or not, or whether you vote or not.

Through it all I think I’ve been consistent in philosophy, and hope that I’ve educated, entertained, and elightened my readers, as I still plan to still be here in my corner of the blogoverse in 20 years time. 

Oh, that’s a real if rather dated picture of me, and yeah, that’s a semi-mullet, worn back at the time when only Brian Eno and a few other folks had one.
— Thanos

Time to Flush the Extremists, not the Koran

The problem in Europe with Muslim extremism is glaringly evident in this short (h/t The Scarlet Crusader). The policy needs to be intolerance towards extremists instead of shelter for extremists – it was shelter from France that created the problems in modern Iran we have today, it was shelter from Britain and the US for the blind Mullah that led to 9/11.

The moderates in Islam will have no voice and no shelter if we allow these rabid voices of hate to bully their way to becoming the voice of Islam in the West. Instead we should be sheltering the moderates from these evils. That’s why it’s important to out extremists who poise as moderates while reviling the west, that’s why it’s important to shelter the principles of freedom that are the basis for our societies, that’s why it’s important to deport the hate-mullahs and death clerics back to the countries who exported them once they became too radical.

Send them back to the countries that created them to foment hate, despair, and destruction there, not here – it will be a valuable lesson for the governments who allow this to fester so they have a weapon to use for destabilization of their neighors. (See the essay “Ancient Enemies” in the sidebar here.)

.

Gore Lied; People Will Die

In the end oil, coal, and food are foolish to burn, all create carcinogenic compounds that pollute the air — and if you have a ecological concern that should be it, not global warming. However our current eco-movements are headed down this exact path, with politicians hostage to the coal, oil, and bio-fuel lobbies worldwide.

It’s an inconvenient truth that across the world valuable cropland is being converted from growing food to growing biofuel. The croplands are being converted with government subsidies, and we are about to learn a very harsh lesson.

In Egypt we have breadlines, in Pakistan and India soaring flour prices, and in the rest of the subcontinent we have rice shortages.

Lester Brown, director of the Earth Policy Institute in Washington, said yesterday that land turned to biofuels in the US alone in the last two years would have fed nearly 250 million people with average grain needs. “This year 18% of all US grain production will go to biofuels. In the last two years the US has diverted 60m tonnes of food to fuel. On the heels of seven years of consumption of world grains exceeding supply, this has put a great strain on the world’s grain supplies,” he said.

The rising price of energy has decreased supplies of food in two ways: it’s made fuel crops more attractive and it’s made export and transport of food staples such as wheat, corn, and rice both more expensive and less appealing.

The outcome? We have breadlines in Egypt, we have spiraling food staples cost, and not enough food, which means people will be starving to death later this year. Yes, we passed a tipping point Al, and it was much closer and more easily seen than the one you spoke of in your movie.

Food production and commodities combined with free markets have kept famine at bay across most of the world since the early 80’s. The fact is that modern famines are created by government policies, or strife which interdicts transport. The Somalian famine was due to civil war against Islamists, and the Bangladesh famine was due to failed governance.

Any country can feed its people no matter how dense the population if they can farm at the level that 16th century Japanese peasants were capable of, this demonstrated in “A Step Further Out” by Jerry Pournelle. In the modern world with cheap transport and modern agriculture there’s simply no excuse for Famine, but I fear we’ve passed that point and that we will see some people starving to death this year.

Some future Chomsky will no doubt be writing screeds about Euro-centric Environmental Imperialism and Energy Hegemony, but in the end it’s exactly that sort of person who’s at fault here. Social liberals and computer models are a terrible combination, as the Club of Rome model tells us. (See here.)

In the end oil, coal, and food are foolish to burn, all create carcinogenic compounds that pollute the air — and if you have a ecological concern that should be it, not global warming. However our current eco-movements are headed down this exact path, with politicians hostage to the coal, oil, and bio-fuel lobbies worldwide.

We have the means to create plentiful, worldwide, cheap energy with Nuclear, Solar, Hydroelectric, Wind, Geothermal, Ocean thermal, and in the future Solar Power Satellites. The chest of options for really clean energy is full, but we fail to open it.

Our goal needs to be more than energy independence, if we are truly a great nation then we should set the bar higher – we must create abundant clean energy for the world.

All of the clean technologies are capable of generating electricity at a reasonable cost point which would surely come down if they were put into large-scale use, and all of them are feasible. With the exception of Solar power satellites, they have all been used for large scale electric generation. Also if you don’t think solar power satellites are feasible I will point you to the saga of Spirit and Opportunity, both live on past all expectations of gloom.

The future of the world is bright, but not if we follow charlatans and fear-monger lobbies who are really just after world socialism and wealth redistribution. We don’t need carbon credits, we need nuclear power. We don’t need carbon sequestration, we need hydrogen fuel research. We don’t need Kyoto, we need energy.

In the end Al Gore lied, and people will likely die. Don’t worry however: If famine does come, as appears likely, Al can sponsor a “Concert for X” (insert country name with hundreds of thousands dieing of starvation at X,) to make himself feel better about it.

[editor: Much more on energy potentials can be found online, and in the sidebar here under “Energetic Futures”. If you can find a copy of Jerry Pournelle’s book , I recommend you grab it. It’s a seminal work on the subject. Photo Credit Don McCullin, Contact Press]

Obama Schooled on Defense

What is Barack’s stance on the Taiwan straits? How does he want to handle Myanmar? Where is he at on South America? What would he do if Hugo Chavez invaded Panama, Costa Rica, Ecuador, or Columbia? What’s his position on North Korea? What would he do about the increasing belligerence of Russia? Where does he stand on Tibet? What would he do if Kosovo and Serbia go to war, and Europe starts choosing up sides?

John McCain has slammed Obama on Defense policy in Iraq, but this is only one narrow dimension of our defense policy — while it’s very important today in five years this back and forth might not matter crazy as that sounds.

Our bases in Germany, Japan, South Korea, or Kuwait are not controversial, and if a country wants to ally with us and support bases, we should be ok with that. US military bases are an important part of world stability, prior to us extending our strategic reach the entire world was wracked with chronic conflicts and incessant war.

Any Chompskyite critics of Pax Americana who want to characterise it as Hegemony and US Imperialism need only look at history — Compare Europe pre-WWII to post-WWII – no European country is a puppet-state to the US, as can be seen by the anti-US sentiment of several European governments and bodies. They aren’t perfect allies either but commerce is flowing and peace is prevalent in those regions we have bases, no matter how imperfect our allies might be.

Where we do have bases countries are less fearful of their neighbors and more likely to trade with them. Where we have bases tyrannical states are less likely to threaten and bully. Where we have bases terrorism is less likely to flourish.

Barack clearly doesn’t want to get the point that McCain is speaking to, but he also doesn’t understand the rest of our strategic defense direction either. In PC-Gamer terms Obama’s a “newbie” who would get “pwned” on the international stage of Geo-political reality.

Our military stance is based on certain superiorities that we have, and that’s good for now, but not for the future if we fail to extend and update those capacities.

  • We can attack a foe with less ammo and consequent logistics chains because we have superior electronic warfare capabilities. We can guide our varied munitions via gps, television, laser, satellite, and a variety of other means, but our window of superiority there is closing as other nations are implementing similar or same systems. Research into next generation systems is continually shaved by Barack and his peers.
  • We have good missile defense, however it’s not fully deployed, and there are layers missing in the missile screen. Even as our allies deploy forward missile defense systems (Japan, South Korea, Poland, Czechoslovakia) Barrack Obama and others in the Senate are delaying programs with the goal of cutting them entirely. Ballistic missile defense is a key component in our strategic infrastructure, and it’s doubtful others will deploy if the program is put in doubt.
  • We can project power and defense capabilities quickly through combined systems that include our aircraft carriers, troopships, missile cruisers, SSBN’s, forward bases, ICBMs and long range strategic bombers and fighters. Congress continues to decrement our Air, Naval, and Land force capabilities through the death of a 1000 cuts. Barack votes consistently against all flavors of military spending.
  • The next wave of war fighting capabilities will be with unmanned drones, and other robotic and teleoperated systems. While other countries are racing to take the lead in that arena, once more congress with Barack’s support is shaving funding and research.

The big difference between Barack Obama and John McCain isn’t only on Iraq. It’s also in the approach to our defensive systems. If elected Barack would support further cuts, reductions, slow-downs and eliminations. He’s said he will cut billions from defense, and that he’s against missile defense.

It never fails that when a new war comes that we are well prepared to fight the last war we were in, but not the one in our face. John McCain understands that equation, and that’s why the clear difference on defense between him and Barack Obama is a yawning chasm, in which Iraq is just the visible edge.

If Barack gets the nod from the Democrat convention, then those differences will become much clearer.

.

He says his sole priority will be protecting the american people, but in the speech above you see him promising to take away every strategic advantage we have, which will put us all in clear jeapordy. You can see that he is viscerally opposed to all defense spending, and this puts your children at risk in the real world.

What is Barack’s stance on the Taiwan straits? How does he want to handle Myanmar? Where is he at on South America? What would he do if Hugo Chavez invaded Panama, Costa Rica, Ecuador, or Columbia? What’s his position on North Korea? What would he do about the increasing belligerence of Russia? Where does he stand on Tibet? What would he do if Kosovo and Serbia go to war, and Europe starts choosing up sides?

Where would he be if India and Pakistan went to war? What would he do if Iran gets nuclear weapons, and attacks Israel? What is his policy towards Turkey? What about the Sudan?

The truth is that Obama’s quite naive when it comes to defense, and he’s a babe in the woods when it comes to strategic geo-politics. His voicing of threats against Pakistan is clear proof of that. Putting him in office would be a risk to your children, and your grand children, for cuts in research have long-term effects.

Several nations are racing to close the window of our military superiority, and some like Russia and China with their space programs are working to close it and nail it shut forever.